Critical Vulnerabilities in Microsoft macOS Apps Expose Users to Potential Unauthorized Access

macos

Eight newly discovered vulnerabilities in Microsoft applications for macOS could enable attackers to bypass the operating system’s permissions framework, allowing unauthorized access to sensitive data and elevated privileges. The vulnerabilities affect popular Microsoft apps, including Outlook, Teams, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote. Security researchers from Cisco Talos warn that these flaws could let attackers send emails, record audio or video, and take photos without the user’s consent.

Understanding the TCC Framework
Apple’s Transparency, Consent, and Control (TCC) framework is designed to protect sensitive user data on macOS by ensuring that applications only access data with explicit user consent. TCC works alongside macOS’s application sandboxing feature, which restricts an app’s access to the system and other applications, providing an extra layer of security. The framework maintains an encrypted database that records the permissions granted by users to each application, ensuring consistent enforcement across the system. This approach aims to provide transparency and control over how applications interact with user data.

However, Cisco Talos has highlighted that these protections can be circumvented if an attacker can inject malicious code into trusted applications. This type of attack, known as library injection or Dylib Hijacking, allows malicious libraries to be loaded into the application, which then operates with the permissions and entitlements granted to the legitimate app.

How the Vulnerabilities Work
The vulnerabilities identified in Microsoft’s macOS applications could allow an attacker to inject malicious libraries into these apps, thereby gaining access to sensitive information and privileges granted to the applications. For instance, an attacker could exploit these flaws to send emails from the user’s account, record audio clips, or take pictures and videos—all without the user’s knowledge or consent.

According to Talos researcher Francesco Benvenuto, macOS includes countermeasures such as the hardened runtime feature, which is designed to minimize the risk of executing arbitrary code within another app’s process. However, if an attacker manages to inject a library into the process space of a running application, they can misuse all the permissions already granted to that app, effectively operating as if they were the application itself.

Potential Risks and Exploitation Scenarios
While the vulnerabilities pose significant risks, exploiting them requires attackers to have some level of access to the compromised system beforehand. This access can be used to inject a malicious library into a more privileged app, granting the attacker permissions associated with the exploited application. A trusted app compromised in this manner could then be used to abuse its permissions, giving the attacker unauthorized access to sensitive data without user consent.

These vulnerabilities often exploit scenarios where applications load libraries from locations that an attacker could manipulate, especially if the application has disabled library validation—a risky entitlement that, when set to true, allows loading of libraries not signed by the application’s developer or Apple.

phishing

Microsoft’s Response and Mitigation Efforts
Microsoft has categorized the identified issues as “low risk,” noting that these apps need to load unsigned libraries to support plugins. Despite this assessment, Microsoft has moved to address the vulnerabilities in its OneNote and Teams apps. The company acknowledged that the flaws could leave a window open for adversaries to exploit the apps’ entitlements and permissions without any user prompts, effectively allowing the app to act as a permission broker for the attacker.

Francesco Benvenuto pointed out the challenges in securely handling such plug-ins within macOS’s current framework. One potential solution is the notarization of third-party plug-ins, which involves verifying their security before signing them. However, this approach would require significant collaboration between Microsoft and Apple to ensure that third-party modules are secure before being authorized for use.

Implications for macOS Security
The vulnerabilities highlight a broader issue with how macOS applications manage permissions and security. As Benvenuto explained, “macOS trusts applications to self-police their permissions. A failure in this responsibility leads to a breach of the entire permission model, with applications inadvertently acting as proxies for unauthorized actions, circumventing TCC and compromising the system’s security model.”

These findings underscore the need for both developers and users to remain vigilant about app permissions and the potential risks associated with loading unsigned libraries. As the cybersecurity landscape evolves, ensuring robust security measures and careful handling of app permissions will be crucial in protecting user data on macOS.

While Microsoft has made some progress in mitigating these issues, the company—and other software developers—must continue to prioritize security to prevent similar vulnerabilities from being exploited in the future.

Follow us on x twitter (Twitter) for real time updates and exclusive content.

Scroll to Top